You are hereBlogs / Richard Cizik's blog / What War On Religion?

What War On Religion?

By Richard Cizik - Posted on 09 March 2012

The fierce backlash from some evangelical Christian leaders to President Obama's sensible decision to cover contraception services under the health care reform law brings to mind Groucho Marx's definition of politics: "The art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it, and then misapplying the wrong remedies."

Christian mega-pastor Rick Warren is willing to engage in civil disobedience. The National Association of Evangelicals is reportedly considering asking pastors of every evangelical denomination to read an open letter to their congregations calling the requirement to make birth control for women available without co-pays an attack on religious liberty -- despite an exemption for religious institutions affiliated with faiths that forbid contraception. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, insists there is "no compromise."

As an evangelical leader, I've been involved in defending religious freedom for three decades. Compromise is not always a moral failure in a pluralistic society. In an election year, we must also distinguish between real attacks on faith and cheap demagoguery to score political points. GOP presidential candidates who have been assailing President Obama's supposed "war on religion" should be ashamed of themselves. This irresponsible and inflammatory rhetoric makes a mockery of the victims of real wars and unconscionable religious persecution around the world.

The fact is the Obama administration listened to concerns raised in response to an initial ruling that exempted houses of worship but not religious hospitals, schools or social service providers to the new contraception coverage rule, and crafted a common-ground solution that protects both religious liberty and women's health. No religiously affiliated institutions will have to pay for these services or even refer employees to this coverage. Instead, if a woman's employer is an objecting religious institution, her insurer will be the party required to enter into a separate contract to offer contraception coverage at no cost. Christian leaders concerned about protecting religious liberty rather than broadly restricting contraception should be satisfied with this accommodation.

Remember that under the health care reform law all insurance plans are required to cover a host of preventive services at no cost -- check-ups, mammograms, immunizations and cancer screenings. This will help save lives and control health-care costs. The non-partisan National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine recommended including birth control under these covered services. The Obama administration was wise to listen to the advice of the nation's leading medical experts.

While Catholic bishops and some evangelical leaders continue to thunder against even the revised solution that defends religious liberty and women's health, other religious leaders have expressed appreciation to the Obama administration for acting quickly to address concerns. The Catholic Health Association, representing more than 600 hospitals and 1,400 long-term care health facilities, welcomed the revisions.

Catholic bishops are now appearing to move the goal posts. They even want Catholics who own a business with no religious purpose -- a Taco Bell, for example -- to be exempt from providing contraception coverage under health care plans. Worse, the bishops and some of their evangelical allies even supported Republican-sponsored legislation that would have allowed all employers to refuse to cover any service they find morally objectionable. The Senate appropriately rejected this legislation that would have put the health of American families at the mercy of employers who have economic incentives to deny crucial medical services.

Let's not allow the political noise of an election year to distract us from basic facts or reject pragmatic solutions that will help the American people.

Published in The Huffington Post.

Evangelicals are not bothered about the President desiring that people have contraceptives. The problem is the President wants the Catholic Church to provide the contraceptives. That is like asking Green Peace to provide its staff with whale leather boots or allowing them to wear the ones provided in there name by someone else. And the problem is that it is against the Constitution, which the president has little problem walking all over, that protects religious rights. I should not have to do something that is against my religious beliefs. Do you really think the insurance company is going to cover the contraceptives? Of course not. It will be passed on to the insured-The Catholic Church When did insurance ever give anything for free? If they didn't like the health care plan then these women should have gotten jobs else where. Why go somewhere knowing what you are getting into and then complain about the situation. Don't go.

New Evangelical Manifesto

Sign up for updates

Our Mission:

The New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good exists to advance human well-being as an expression of our love for Jesus Christ, which is itself a grateful response to his love for us and for a good but suffering world.

Subscribe to Uncommon Voices for the Common Good

Signing up for "Uncommon Voices," our blog on faith & culture, is free. Add your voice to ideas that confront the most powerful challenges we face today!

Enter your email address:

Follow Us

Follow NewEvangelical on Twitter