You are hereBlogs / Richard Cizik's blog / Family Planning: Godly and Green?

Family Planning: Godly and Green?


By Richard Cizik - Posted on 21 April 2012

Who could have predicted that access to family planning services would become “Topic A” in the race to the White House? Or that a “war on women” would ignite based on contraceptive coverage provided under the health care law approved by Congress and President Obama?

Almost anything can happen in an election year. What’s next, the converging of women’s issues with energy and environmental policy? It could happen. The issues are inextricably linked, even if many currently won’t talk about it.

Speaking on the environment at the World Bank a few years ago, someone in the audience rose to ask me: “Why won’t people of faith address issues of population?” I replied that “We’ve begun to address climate change, and sooner or later, we’ll have to talk honestly about population. But it’s very controversial.” Afterwards someone sent an email to evangelical leaders accusing me of support for “population control,” such as China’s “one-child” policy. Completely false, but it happened.

In the minds of millions of Americans, family planning of any kind equals abortion. Facts however tell a different story: it is the lack of family planning that often leads to abortion.

It’s now time to correct this misunderstanding lest women around the world suffer needlessly. At stake are not just the lives of hundreds of millions of women – it’s the health of the planet itself.

Groundbreaking studies by the Futures Group and the National Center for Atmospheric Research confirm that giving women and girls access to contraception offers our planet a precious co-benefit: a substantial reduction in carbon emissions.

These studies show that when women have the power to plan their families, populations grow more slowly, as do greenhouse gas emissions. Providing modern contraception to all women who want it would reduce essential carbon emissions by 8-15 percent. That’s equivalent to ending all deforestation or increasing the world’s use of wind power 40-fold! Moreover, the cost of providing family services is small compared with other carbon emission reduction strategies – about $3.7 billion annually.

Not surprisingly, the same political conservatives who deny man-made climate change are too often oblivious to the threats posed by the lack of access to contraceptives. Though unexpectedly, even political liberals have largely ignored the issue’s urgency. The result: one in four births worldwide is unplanned, leading to 42 million abortions each year (half of them clandestine) and 68,000 women’s deaths.

God gave the care of the Earth and its inhabitants to our first parents. That responsibility has now passed into our hands. We are not the owners of creation, but its stewards, summoned by God to “watch over and care for it” (Genesis 2:15).

This implies the principle of sustainability: our uses of the Earth must conserve and renew the planet rather than deplete or destroy it. People are included in that protective mantle. 

Shouldn't it be a Christian imperative to help an estimated 125 million women worldwide avoid the social, emotional, and spiritual trauma – and for some, the life-threatening risk – of not having access to family planning?

Making that information, education, and contraception easily available is an effective way to be faithful to God’s commands. By providing this help, we also supply, in effect, a “green technology” that reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

There’s an added benefit. Women, particularly in developing nations, face disproportionate risks from climate change – droughts, floods, and mudslides among them. In parts of Africa and Asia, the majority of agricultural workers are female (65% of household food production in Asia and 75% in Africa), so such extreme weather disasters directly affect women’s income, food security, and health. By investing in women’s lives, we strengthen the resilience of our communities and nations against climate change.

What’s good for women – including family planning, education and contraception – is good for the planet.

this was a very interesting articleand also informative. thanks for sharing. PPI Claim Back Company

"Afterwards someone sent an email to evangelical leaders accusing me of support for “population control,” such as China’s “one-child” policy. Completely false, but it happened."

I'm sorry this happened to you, but not surprised. Many pro-lifers seem to have the idea that either you're with them on everything -- including not just abortion but also contraception, LGBT rights, and being a Republican -- or else you are suspect and likely to be a wolf in sheep's clothing. We at All Our Lives have been accused many times of supporting abortion, to the point where people will flat out refuse to believe us when we explicitly state that we don't. Why? Because we support contraception, and they've been taught that contraception leads inevitably to abortion. And anyone who is "really" pro-life would believe that too, so we must be untrustworthy. It's maddening.

How crass to argue for birth control from a dubious link to "climate change." Could there be a hidden agenda in this article? If you're going to make a biblical argument about the gift and benefits of birth control, then make it plainly. But to politicize a serious discussion about children with the "global warming" card is disgusting. The evidence that human population growth causes climate change is already tenuous. From that tenuous evidence, the author expects us to believe that one person's kids cause climate change (the implication is that we should view all children as a preventable curse on the environment and stop them from being born whenever we can do so respectably). The climate change argument is guilty of the fallacy of affirming the consequent; i.e. it draws a conclusion from premises that do not support that conclusion. The author treats having children as a necessary condition of global warming, and concludes that if global warming happens, it's because people are having too many kids. But having kids is NOT a necessary condition of climate change, therefore the argument falls flat. Rather than trying to curb population growth, Christians should be teaching people how to lift the quality of life of the less fortunate, and to responsibly care for the environment. If you want strong communities, don't discourage children--teach children how to be burden lifters in their communities! The Bible has nothing negative to say about population growth. But it has a lot to say about character, hard work, helping the poor, making wise decisions, and curbing greed. Shouldn't we celebrate the gift of high birth rates, and help the next generation of burden-lifters to build stronger, more responsible communities?

New Evangelical Manifesto

Sign up for updates

Our Mission:



The New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good exists to advance human well-being as an expression of our love for Jesus Christ, which is itself a grateful response to his love for us and for a good but suffering world.

Subscribe to Uncommon Voices for the Common Good

Signing up for "Uncommon Voices," our blog on faith & culture, is free. Add your voice to ideas that confront the most powerful challenges we face today!

Enter your email address:

Follow Us

Follow NewEvangelical on Twitter

Search